DES-61 Microdose Reassessment

Final Design Decisions

for Stephanie's review and signoff

Prepared by: SadraFor: Stephanie

How to use this document

  1. Review each of the 9 design decisions below. For each one, click the option you prefer.
  2. Use the notes field under each decision if you have comments, pushback, or want to pair an approval with a change request.
  3. Review the Pending Copy Approvals section after the 9 decisions - these are content items waiting on your signoff.
  4. Fill in your name and any overall notes in the Signoff section at the bottom.
  5. Click Review & Send. A preview opens with three options: open in Gmail (recommended), download as PDF, or copy to clipboard.
0 of 9 decisions made0%
1

Info Panel - "In this reassessment, you'll..."

Where it shows: Entry screen (landing) and top of Questionnaire. Sets expectations for what the reassessment involves.

Current default: A (white card with icon and bullet grid)

Not decided
2

Review Flow - does the Review page stay?

Where it shows: between Selection screen and Questionnaire. The dedicated "Review Your Treatment Plan" page confirms the selection before clinical intake.

Open question from Amir. Any option other than A needs a home for the legal framing and pricing reinforcement currently on the Review page.

Not decided
3

Base Section - "More Effective" indicator

Where it shows: Base selection section header on the Selection screen. Visually flags that GLP-1/GIP is more effective than GLP-1 alone.

Current default: A (teal ribbon). Option E uses the exact PDF-spec wording "More effective*" as an inline tag.

Not decided
4

Base Section - Disclosure pattern

Where it shows: Base cards on the Selection screen. The mechanism behind each pair (how it works, what makes it different) needs somewhere to live.

Current default: A (inline "Read more" expand).

Not decided
5

Additive Section - Presentation

Where it shows: Additive selection section on the Selection screen. How users explore and pick an additive (NAD+, B12, Glycine, L-Carnitine, or None).

Option G is the PDF spec (Most Popular chip + chevron). Other options were divergent explorations.

Not decided
6

Dose Section - Display pattern

Where it shows: Dose selection section on the Selection screen (WL injection only). How users see their current dose and choose to maintain / increase / decrease.

Source-approved tiers and mg amounts in all variants. Differences are presentation only.

Not decided
7

BMI Eligibility - Display on Weight Management option

Where it shows: Program section on the Selection screen when a Microdose user is considering switching to Weight Management (requires BMI 22+).

Needs to clearly tie the BMI requirement to the WM option specifically, not MD. Source copy: "Requires a BMI of 22 or higher."

Not decided
8

Clinical Footnote - "Based on clinical studies" disclaimer

Where it shows: Below the Base selection section. Ties back to the "More effective*" tag and explains the clinical evidence basis.

Source copy is fixed; this is purely about presentation. The asterisk reference system is active only when Decision 3 is option E.

Not decided
9

Medical Disclaimer - "Final treatment decisions are made by a licensed provider"

Where it shows: Bottom of the Selection screen, just above the fold under the summary bar. Sets expectations that the provider has final say.

Source copy: "Final treatment decisions, including dosing and formulation, are determined by a licensed provider based on your individual health profile."

Not decided

Pending Copy Approvals

Content items waiting on your signoff, separate from the presentation decisions above. For each, pick one: Approve as-is, Needs changes (write what in notes), or Needs more info.

Info Panel bulletsProposed copy

The three bullets under "In this reassessment, you'll":
• Share any updates to your medical history since last intake
• Let your provider know how your treatment has been working
• Review, consent, and verify your ID before provider sign-off

Additive descriptions (B12, Glycine, L-Carnitine)From source tab

Descriptions pulled verbatim from the Frontend Tier Display tab. Wording for each additive currently shipping in the prototype:
B12: "Vitamin B12 is a nutrient that supports energy metabolism and nervous system function."
Glycine: (current copy in prototype)
L-Carnitine: (current copy in prototype)

Disqualification screen heading

The H1 users see when they're disqualified mid-questionnaire. Currently: "We need to pause your reassessment." Is this the final wording?

Confirmation screen chrome

Post-submission confirmation screen framing: heading, subhead, illustration or icon treatment. The prototype's current version flagged [Pending Stephanie Approval].

GLP-1 + GIP vs GLP-1/GIP formatting

The compound base is displayed two different ways in source materials: as GLP-1 + GIP (plus format) or GLP-1/GIP (slash format). Which should ship?

"84-day commitment" placement

Where should the 84-day treatment commitment note live? Options currently explored: on each base card, in the summary bar, on the Review page, or in the questionnaire.

Program option descriptionsNot in source

Short descriptions used under each program name in the Program selection section. Not in any source doc - proposed copy:
Microdose: "Longevity-focused low-dose maintenance."
Weight Management: "Active weight-loss treatment at standard dosing."

Program Switch screen copyPending Lauren too

Shown when a Microdose patient changes Program to Weight Management on Selection and hits Continue. Handles the transition moment before routing to a new intake. Current proposed body copy: "Weight Management uses a different starting dose than Microdose. A new medical intake is required so a licensed provider can determine your starting dose before prescribing." Separately blocked by Lauren on: what happens to the patient's current Microdose subscription (auto-pause, auto-continue, billing cutover) during the switch.

GLP-1/GIP source description typoFYI

Heads up: the Frontend Tier Display tab's GLP-1/GIP description contains an appended typo fragment. Source reads: "Targets two complementary hormone pathways involved in appetite and blood sugar regulation.involved in appetite and blood sugar control." The prototype uses the clean version ("...involved in appetite and blood sugar regulation.") - Lauren should confirm this is OK or specify the correct ending.

Signoff

Once sent, this package goes directly to Sadra. He'll use it as the source of truth for the final design handoff to engineering.

9 decisions still unselected